Received: from storm.worldnet.net (root@storm.worldnet.net [194.2.128.241])
	by maskin.oden.se (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA22233
	for <dlanor@oden.se>; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 03:55:18 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1 (wn16-193.paris.worldnet.fr [195.3.16.193])
	by storm.worldnet.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA03884
	for <dlanor@oden.se>; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 03:58:23 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 03:58:23 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199803070258.DAA03884@storm.worldnet.net>
To: dlanor@oden.se (Ronald Andersson)
From: res1@vcf-com.fr (Olivier Booklage)
Organization: vcf-com.fr
Subject: Re: About masquerade and IP dynamic addr
X-Mailer: NEWSie Version 0.88 (Atari)
X-UIDL: 05ae7d33dca8666deadf6351c43812ce

>>I have an other question .. is about speed by my Midi Intranet.

>No real secret.  It is just that I code everything in assembler...

Humm.. it is not my favorite language :( but it is not impossible for
me to write some subroutines in assembler.

>Also, since Masque.Stx implements a pseudo-port, it gets called directly
>by the STinG kernel to handle incoming and outgoing traffic.  This is an
>interface not available to a normal STinG server/client.  The timer call
>is the closest equivalent available to them, but it must be used with great
>care...  Wasting time in such routines can lower throughput of the entire
>local network, because these calls are made inside an interrupt service
>routine.

Yes, i have read the STinG developpement documentation about Timer, and
I think to that Timer routines are not for usuals clients or servers.

I have never use STinG memory, do you think is necessary for a server ?

Best Regards,
Olivier.


--------------------------------------------------------------
from Boulogne Billancourt FRANCE

 Atari STe    4Mo
 Atari Falcon 14Mo
 Macintosh classic
 IntraNet STinG/PPP/Masquerade

Fido  :2:325/3.50@fidonet.org
email :res1@vcf-com.fr
web   :http://services.worldnet.net/vcf-com/  (194.2.128.248)
--------------------------------------------------------------

.
